Is the AI build-out overheating? A transparent, real-data read of the AI / semiconductor cycle across value, fundamentals, supply chain and the macro / Fed backdrop — a composite, not a single trend line. High = stretched and fragile.
| name | fwd P/E | PEG | Δmgn |
|---|---|---|---|
| NVDA | 16.4 | 0.65 | +16.5 |
| AMD | 42.1 | 1.29 | +3.6 |
| AVGO | 20.2 | 0.75 | +9.5 |
| TSM | 23.8 | 1.44 | +9.6 |
| ASML | 40.2 | 2.83 | +0.7 |
| SMCI | 11.2 | 0.91 | +2.9 |
| MU | 10.0 | 0.36 | +45.6 |
| Qwen/Qwen3-0.6B | 27.7M |
| Qwen/Qwen3-4B | 16.3M |
| openai-community/gpt2 | 13.4M |
| Qwen/Qwen3-8B | 12.9M |
| Qwen/Qwen2.5-7B-Instruct | 12.7M |
Cassandra is a transparent conditions monitor, not a crash predictor. It blends six real-data categories — valuation (Shiller CAPE & the Fed-model risk premium), fundamentals (semis margins, growth, PEG), supply chain (hyperscaler capex & GPU rents), macro / Fed (VIX, credit spreads, the yield curve, financial conditions), crowding (equal- vs cap-weight breadth, semis concentration) and AI demand — into one gauge. Each sub-score is ranked against real history or scored by a transparent, documented rule; weights are a judgement (valuation 22% · fundamentals 18% · supplychain 14% · macro 22% · crowding 12% · adoption 12%), not fitted. A category without enough data is shown as "building history" and excluded — never given a fabricated score. The point is the balance: rich valuations can be offset by strong fundamentals, or amplified by a tightening macro.
Adoption caveat: the China-vs-US panel is open-weight Hugging Face download share, a real but partial proxy — it captures open-model self-host adoption (skewed toward open-weight Chinese labs) and excludes closed APIs (GPT, Claude, Gemini) that dominate actual inference. CAPE is a broad-market GAAP measure; the semis fundamentals are current snapshots with a multi-quarter margin trend.